Monday, June 23, 2014

NYT letter to editor, A Call for Drastic Changes in Educating Lawyers

Posted by susan titus glascoff at 2/16/2013 10:37 AM 
NYT letter to editor, A Call for Drastic Changes in Educating Lawyers, Ethan Bronner, Feb. 11, 2013

It was a relief to read that there is almost universal agreement that the current system is broken. A focus is needed to create more skill levels to reduce education expenses & taylor training & consumer cost for non-court matters. However, I am disappointed that no mention was made re need for more practical training re lots of specific issues, one key one being anything relating to family courts (including raising the prestige level), another being excessive hourly billing re anything likely to head to court, a third being addressing loophole issues (such as scads of delaying tactics), & a monumental fourth one being establishing enforceable checks & balances on unfair (or worse) behavior by any court actors, but especially judges.

A task force member noting “The house is on fire” is right on target! How about making an educational project in lawschool to address closing loopholes (students could choose specialties)?

Susan Titus Glascoff

(WWho in Amer, etc, masters Health Advocacy & Math....)

PS-Commentary-other articles,(next blog entry 2 pg questionnaire on web re “YOU Be Judge- 10 questions about legal accountability, & disturbing facts.” [Taub case-legal abuse grows- proposed settlement very convoluted, trying to hide fact it subtracts out all it 1st gives, awards abuse!!]
  1. 2/11/13- “Measure to Protect Women Stuck on Tribal Land Issue,”- the fact that the horrors of what has been happening have long been ignored is despicable & again makes us not much better than how India & many countries with third-world areas treat females. Note Mr. Udall said, “Native women should not be abandoned to a jurisdictional loophole.” Choose any topic- you'll find a crying need to close legal loopholes!

  2. 2/6/13- “A Death Penalty Fight Comes Home to Maryland,” - it notes that prosecutors & jurors ignored glaring problems with witnesses. WHY? HOW? Mr. Bloodstone only managed to win his release after 9 years in the state's most decrepid & violent prison. How about those who don't possess such willpower or intelligence or get lucky enough to snag some lawyer's interest? Then he was merely awarded $300,000 in compensation, yet the legal system awards plaintiffs millions for lesser suffering! What about victims in civil court, especially the excruciating pain for protective parents when custody is awarded to abusers, even in the face of documented evidence (& many of course can't produce that, but the testimony is usually searing when it is the truth- credible studies put lying about this very low- I think less than 5%). How about those impoverished by the system? What about the intangible costs to society from cycling abuse?

  3. 2/5/13- “In 2 Trailers, The Neighbors Nobody Wants,”- hmmmm.......society doesn't want released sexual predators near where they live, but how about fact the media keeps ignoring that for thousands (The award-winning documentary, NoWayOutButOne, notes ~58,000 cases per yr reported where child is awarded into custody of an abuser) the abuser is in the house?

  4. 2/11/13- “The Ignorance Caucus,” Paul Krugman- his sarcasm is excellent noting Mr. Cantor calling for an end to federal funding of social science research is “Because it's surely a waste of money seeking to understand the society we're trying to change.” And Mr. Krugman also correctly directs his anger at the NRA bullying fed. agencies into ceasing nearly all research about firearms & violence. How about another research project for law students & professors as well- how can we establish laws & regulations that prevent minority views blocking the majority, esp. when it is over 60%?

  5. 2/12/13- “Carpe Diem Nation,” David Brooks- “we forget- most our ancestors were immigrants who left everything to establish a new life, working hard for better future for their kids... We've become so greedy we sacrifice our kids' future!” How about legal research: curbing right to sue, insisting on reasonable awards &malpractice premiums, fair treatment non-whites long abused?


  1. You have good advocacies. I can see where they are coming from. These days, sadly, no matter how hard one puts their causes in the open through writing, money is the number one tool to make those happen. And getting money is the one dilemma all people struggle the hardest. - Layce of paper writing.

  2. This is the idea I need for my research writing! I was searching for something like that, but it wasn't the thing I need. Thank you very much for this blog and posting

  3. I really like your modern stylish ideas which you have shared about profile
    This blog provide extraordinary and exact information for which I was searching.

  4. Looks great! I love how "messy" it is... bestessayscom
    great style!

  5. I completely welcome your site post. Your post offered me some astonishing data and innovativeness that I was searching for to upgrade my substance. Much obliged to you truly to help me by noting my couple of issues whose arrangements I was searching for such quite a while. For more information

  6. Your post offered me some astonishing data and innovativeness

  7. That’s why we feel you much and services. It is very easy to finding us as we are at your city or nearest places

  8. Wonderful article, thanks for putting this together! This is obviously one great post. Thanks for the valuable information and insights you have so provided here.

  9. Regardless, enrollment with any State Bar Council does not restrict the Advocate from appearing under the vigilant gaze of any court in India, in spite of the way that it is past the territorial district of the State Bar Council which he is chosen in.Website

  10. Giving the best criminal resistance benefit does not imply that top criminal lawyers should charge to a great degree high rates for their administrations.محام المرور في إسرائيل

  11. I have heard grumblings about lawyers who might not tell the customer what was happening with their cases, yet would charge the customer when the customer called to ask what was going on.עורך דין תביעה ייצוגית

  12. Since few of us appreciate imperial ancestry or attractive trusts that guarantee top of the line travel in existence with next to zero requirement for work, we should pick exchanges of sorts to pay our way through life. how to find a good malpractice lawyer

  13. Why? Since I need them to meet my staff and see exactly how well they deal with customers. how to get the most money from a car accident